A Thermal Modeling Comparison of Typical Curtainwall Glazing Systems

Jerry Ma & Cheryl Fan

This paper compares the U value and energy consumption of typical Curtainwall glazing systems used in commercial buildings. These glazing practices are popular in the major cities of the world. There are four basic types of systems that are compared.
1. Glazing systems that use Insulating glass which are mechanically fi xed in gaskets
2. 4 sided structural silicone glazed with wet weatherseals
3. 4 sided structural silicone glazed with dry gasket weatherseal
4. Hybrid glazing system (structurally clamped).
The thermal modeling is performed based upon WinIso 2D using three different IG unit designs for the first three systems noted above. The IG unit designs evaluated are:
1. aluminium spacer
2. stainless steel spacer
3. warm edge spacer technology
The Hybrid glazing system is modeled only with an aluminum spacer. After calculating the U Value for a system, the results can be used to demonstrate how to evaluate the energy consumption for a specifi c system in a specifi c location, and compare these results relative to different confi gurations.
This paper details that mechanically fi xed systems demonstrate good initial performance, but the aging of gaskets results in shrinkage. Furthermore, compression set of the gaskets allows additional air and water infi ltration, rendering the system even less effective. Gasket joint systems also allow additional exposure to the elements of the middle of the aluminum system which further decreases the energy effi ciency. Structural glazed systems using the warm edge technology provides an excellent U value and results in the most energy effi cient system

Full text article [439 KB]

The Authors